Aggressive Copyright has to be a controversial reflection to all Copyrights and restriction „on the market“.

Our life is full of pointless restrictions ungrounded from the natural wisdom. All of them are political calculation screwed up in a way that they fits to local political situation pretending to be naturally true.

I do not believe that so called „Original Author“ ever existed or even that it could exists.
In these last days we have experienced the up-spring of several licenses, such as GNU, GPL, CC with so many flavors nobody is ever able to understand what is he/she can or cannot dare under this or that license, not speaking of the cases we do not know the license beforehand (in 99.99999..%). Although these mentioned licenses are few of those I do believe comes finally with crumb of sense, they are still based on the old bias accepting the „fact“ of the Original author existence.

The most problematic part in this case is the copyright-able work. Because all work is based on preceding work or knowledge no-one can be specified as the “Only author” and so cannot declare him/her self as the Author and consequently takes all right on his/her side.

The problem extends even more if you think of the way how we perceive the work.  For instance, if you think of the music then what is the final work? Bits representing the information (music) on your hard-drive,  CD and so? Or is it the music itself, the sound, rhythm, melody or color of the tones? If you agree with me that the music is rather the last case, then what happen if we hear the music and remember it afterward? Did we stole the music and broke the Authors rights?

So I made the total restrictive copyright.
I have invented the Aggressive Copyright witch totally forbids all possible ways of the work perception in order to avoid consequential problems based on all mentioned misunderstandings.

More about Aggressive Copyright on it’s page here.